“Where marriage and family are outlawed, only outlaws will have wives and children”.
over-extending metaphors is how one accesses greater wyrd. that which is above can only be contingently expressed from below.
«Flavors of Reaction», N. Land.
If only for a secondary backup, it is wise the archive here for the Black Library some (all) of Xenosystems.net´s most worthy posts.
ebruary 19, 2013 admin 13 Comments »
FILED UNDER :Neoreaction , Uncategorized
TAGGED WITH :Catallaxy , Politics , Reaction
Once it is accepted that the right can never agree about anything, the opportunity arises to luxuriate in the delights of diversity. Libertarianism already rivaled Trotskyism as a source of almost incomprehensibly compact dissensus, but the New Reaction looks set to take internecine micro-factionalism into previously unimagined territories. We might as well enjoy it.
From crypto-fascists, theonomists, and romantic royalists, to jaded classical liberals and hard-core constitutionalists, the reaction contains an entire ideological cosmos within itself. Hostility to coercive egalitarianism and a sense that Western civilization is going to hell will probably suffice to get you into the club. Agreeing on anything much beyond that? Forget it.
There’s one dimension of reactionary diversity that strikes Outside in as particularly consequential (insofar as anything out here in the frozen wastes has consequences): the articulation of reaction and politics. Specifically: is the reaction an alternative politics, or a lucid (= cynically realistic) anti-politics? Is democracy bad politics, or simply politics, elaborated towards the limit of its inherently poisonous potential?
Outside in sides emphatically with the anti-political ‘camp’. Our cause is depoliticization (or catallaxy, negatively apprehended). The tradition of spontaneous order is our heritage. The New Reaction warns that the tide is against us. Intelligence will be required, in abundance, if we are to swim the other way, and we agree with the theonomists at least in this: if it is drawn from non-human sources, so much the better. Markets, machines, and monsters might inspire us. Rulers of any kind? Not so much.
NGE comment:
1. No birth without schizm. [2][3]
Particular churches and sects usurp the gates of heaven, and turn the key against each other; and thus we go to heaven against each others’ wills, conceits, and opinions …
― «Religio Medici» 1642
Chronic internal schism–it’s not a bug, it’s a feature
― mitrailleuse.net 2015
2. No rule without rulers.
admin Reply:
March 4th
How can reactionaries criticize free republics for falling apart? Everything reactionaries have ever respected fell apart. Nobody would be a reactionary if their favored configuration of the world hadn’t fallen apart.
Republics are extremely fragile. All the more reason to take devoted care of them (first of all, by protecting them from democracy).
Classical Republicanism is hardly an upstart revolutionary ideology. Insofar as it instantiates apolitical meritocracy — always a challenge, admittedly — it is clearly superior to dynastic rule. The Neocameral idea accepts this clearly, although for reasons that still escape me it is subsequently mystified by royalist rhetorical trappings.
NRX commentary: There´s ‘royalist’ or ‘pseudo-royalist’ and then there´s regal.
Behind the tourist facade of British royalty there is Royal capitalism.
Now in for a return with a redux. Legionnaires, marines.
so it was seen…
that “NRx” chose the crab as its symbol,
be cause crabs pull each other down
(preventing exit)
out of the bucket in which they
are all together stuck, so far
so much… ? And God ☦
held the Rainbow
as a sign… IT
will be F-
🌈
twitter.com/Nero
We’re all bored, we’re all so tired of everything
We wait for trains that just aren’t coming
We show off our different scarlet letters—
Trust me, mine is better
We wait for trains that just aren’t coming
We show off our different scarlet letters—
Trust me, mine is better
We’re so young but we’re on the road to ruin
We play dumb but we know exactly what we’re doing
We cry tears of mascara in the bathroom
Honey, life is just a classroom
‘Cause, baby, I could build a castle
Out of all the bricks they threw at me
And every day is like a battle
But every night with us is like a dream
Baby, we’re the new romantics
Come on, come along with me
Heart break is the national anthem
We sing it proudly
We are too busy dancing
To get knocked off our feet
Baby, we’re the new romantics
The best people in life are free
We’re all here, the lights and noise are blinding
We hang back, it’s all in the timing
It’s poker, he can’t see it in my face
But I’m about to play my Ace
We need love, but all we want is danger
We team up then switch sides like a record changer
The rumors are terrible and cruel
But, honey, most of them are true
‘Cause, baby, I could build a castle
Out of all the bricks they threw at me
And every day is like a battle
But every night with us is like a dream
Baby, we’re the new romantics
Come on, come along with me
Heart break is the national anthem
We sing it proudly
We are too busy dancing
To get knocked off our feet
Baby, we’re the new romantics
The best people in life are free
So come on, come along with me
The best people in life are free
Please take my hand and
Please take me dancing and
Please leave me stranded,
It’s so romantic
‘Cause, baby, I could build a castle
Out of all the bricks they threw at me
And every day is like a battle
But every night with us is like a dream
‘Cause, baby, I could build a castle
Out of all the bricks they threw at me
And every day is like a battle
But every night with us is like a dream
Baby, we’re the new romantics
Come on, come along with me
Heart break is the national anthem
We sing it proudly
We are too busy dancing
To get knocked off our feet
Baby, we’re the new romantics
The best people in life are free
nee
re produces
to the audience:
a july 8
NGE alteration
of
the july 2, 2016 postus
«paleo agorism»
from
the web-logos
vvitness:
«archeo-agoric apocalypse»
what has archeo-agorism to offer to the lower classes? drugs, sterization & VRr
the hunter gatherer band is a democracy of nobles, of fiercely selected men and women standing in actual, effective equality and freedom.
the first and easiest critique of neoreaction is simply: you haven’t gone far enough.
if it’s true as Land says, that reaction is never regressive enough and modernity is never advanced enough, what you get, at the point where circuit closes, at doom, is nomad cyborgs. a hunter-gatherer band formed by the most fiercely selected elements of technology.
of course, the pseudo-Right can never admit that there was anything of value before civilization, because the so-called “Enlightenment” is arguably the very moment the possibility of a pseudo-Right was made available. barbaric and nomad peoples, with few exceptions, are hierarchical. civilization is the point where the efficiency of anti-hierarchy (the only possible equality) went far enough for the sheer amount of humans in certain places to put selective pressure on groups that could organize settled production (moving became too expensive). war, kingdoms and domination followed suit. at heart, humans are leftist because they are naturally nomads. and leftism leads to the need of rightism.
a machinery of left-right (savage nomads vs civilized settlers) is an intelligence pump. leftist dominant periods see thriving peoples multiplying courses of actions (mutation), rightist dominant periods see selective pressures piling up on populations and the weeding out of the weakest (selection) (see Alexander’s post for more details). after every new turn, intelligence builds itself through global entropy and local extropy production.
looking forward to the future, to how this machinery plays out in the digital age, we can see two fundamental trends: Völkerwanderung and geopolitical fragmentation. as developed countries stability and governance suffers from migration from undeveloped nations (mutation), new and smaller political units compete for resources and market access, diverging in their policies of reception and integration (selection). in the third world, as neopopulist and socialist political projects fail, the following redesign of institutions may provide safer heavens for fleeing populations of Europe and North America. it might be a long shot indeed, but in a 100 years more or less, we may see a very different international scenery, with smaller political units, some thriving some dying, side by side. those thriving are certainly going to have a much more clear understanding of political reality than we do, and their systems are going to be much more pragmatic and realistic then ours.
most importantly, territorial based governance is going to be much less important in most places than it is today. migration between political units and the creation of exit options are likely to push for overlays of distributed governance, with “bitnations” spread all over the world, in close relationship with local governments and giving access to specific locations.
archeo-agorism draws on this scenario: cyber-nomads hunting for experiences
and shopping for societies in a free market of governments.
distributed bands variously organized,
living supra-nationally
and flowing
as pressures
change.
@Habesh321 Took a very long time for different Euro cultures to assimilate in the US…so that makes sense. Crime initially skyrocketed.
— ||| (@hyperstitious) 17 July 2016
politics of grievance
One pathology of our age is a childlike credulity in the magical efficacy of complaint. Don’t complain, build. #NRx
— Moldbuggery (@moldbuggery) 17 July 2016
beware of complainers in your scene.
slander is a form of complaint.
NEU ROMAN X 