re produces

to the audience:

a july 8
NGE alteration
the july 2, 2016 postus

«paleo agorism»

the web-logos


a´nexed here
without congress
in the vein of REMIX Culture

«archeo-agoric apocalypse»

2016-07-07 23_02_00-_liquidate the proletariat_ - Google leit.png

what has archeo-agorism to offer to the lower classes? drugs, sterization & VRr



2016-07-07 01_09_28-TweetDeck.png

the hunter gatherer band is a democracy of nobles, of fiercely selected men and women standing in actual, effective equality and freedom.

the first and easiest critique of neoreaction is simply: you haven’t gone far enough.

if it’s true as Land says, that reaction is never regressive enough and modernity is never advanced enough, what you get, at the point where circuit closes, at doom, is nomad cyborgs. a hunter-gatherer band formed by the most fiercely selected elements of technology.

of course, the pseudo-Right can never admit that there was anything of value before civilization, because the so-called “Enlightenment” is arguably the very moment the possibility of a pseudo-Right was made available. barbaric and nomad peoples, with few exceptions, are hierarchical. civilization is the point where the efficiency of anti-hierarchy (the only possible equality) went far enough for the sheer amount of humans in certain places to put selective pressure on groups that could organize settled production (moving became too expensive). war, kingdoms and domination followed suit. at heart, humans are leftist because they are naturally nomads. and leftism leads to the need of rightism.

a machinery of left-right (savage nomads vs civilized settlers) is an intelligence pump. leftist dominant periods see thriving peoples multiplying courses of actions (mutation), rightist dominant periods see selective pressures piling up on populations and the weeding out of the weakest (selection) (see Alexander’s post for more details). after every new turn, intelligence builds itself through global entropy and local extropy production.

looking forward to the future, to how this machinery plays out in the digital age, we can see two fundamental trends: Völkerwanderung and geopolitical fragmentation. as developed countries stability and governance suffers from migration from undeveloped nations (mutation), new and smaller political units compete for resources and market access, diverging in their policies of reception and integration (selection). in the third world, as neopopulist and socialist political projects fail, the following redesign of institutions may provide safer heavens for fleeing populations of Europe and North America. it might be a long shot indeed, but in a 100 years more or less, we may see a very different international scenery, with smaller political units, some thriving some dying, side by side. those thriving are certainly going to have a much more clear understanding of political reality than we do, and their systems are going to be much more pragmatic and realistic then ours.

most importantly, territorial based governance is going to be much less important in most places than it is today. migration between political units and the creation of exit options are likely to push for overlays of distributed governance, with “bitnations” spread all over the world, in close relationship with local governments and giving access to specific locations.


archeo-agorism draws on this scenario: cyber-nomads hunting for experiences

and shopping for societies in a free market of governments.

distributed bands variously organized,

living supra-nationally

and flowing

as pressures




progressivists, by constantly talking about the future and the both more liberal and more egalitarian, both closer to nature and more cultured society of the future, project into this future contradictory dreams far more than they obey a dialectical reason as severe and binding as reason, period. Traditionalist conservatives understand far better the imperatives of long time spans and of long-term survival, the absolute necessity of familial and national discipline, of healthy demographics, of a religious respect for proven traditions. The serial liberations of progressivists are often similar to the demolition of the arches of a bridge that goes from the past and the present to the future. They are similar to an unchecked unravelling of the social fabric, in which human will or history carve out the institutions. Haunted by the great changes of history — from mediaeval christianity to centralized monarchies, from feudalism to urban communes, from arts and crafts to industrial capitalism, from liberal capitalism to State capitalism — the progressivists forget that the unraveling of customs, or that demographic decadence can cause the ruin of any great institution, and that there is not future for a people undergoing [this].

Beyond the person-God in which you don’t believe, there is the Cosmos-God, the God-of-long-history, the Tao-God, who can’t be rejected without committing suicide.

When monarchy was constructed it was built on the Männerbund; the unit of human males who form a tribal clan. In Great Britain the new democracy, which we may call the Ekklesiasterion (House of Commons), was built right on top of the Castle of monarchy. Then the cathedral of left wing mimetic power was built right on top of that. In each successive act no permission was asked of the previous power structure, and legacy institutions like The Crown and the House of Lords continue to exist in a neutered form.

It is our intention to build the Techno-Commercial Skyscraper right on top of the Cathedral without permission.

So these two prohibitions, against must and ideology in a vacuum, are your first two commandments. Others may also be listed.

(1) Thou shalt not say must or ought.
(2) Thou shalt not practice ideology without reference to power.
Some other commandments:
(3) Thou shalt not be knee-jerk, narrow-minded or possessing of second-hand opinions.
(4) Thou shalt not conform the world to his own incentives, but conform both himself and the world to a superior incentive structure. Never design from selfishness.
(5) When designing, thou shalt not obey societies values, but step outside of them to engineer better ones.
(6) Thou shalt not be a religious or secular fanatic, progressive or puritan.
(7) Thou shalt not be an idealist. All who believe in perfection are evil.


Originally from «Neocameral Future, Preface and Introduction» by , posted on Sunday, July 3, 2016.